In partnership with
Are Vague Emails Killing Your Momentum?
Vague emails cost more than bad ones because they quietly tank engagement, confuse your ICP, and poison your CRM from the inside out. It is the equivalent of putting fuzzy socks on an ice rink and calling it traction.
When your ICP is unclear and your messaging tries to serve everyone, your email program absorbs the damage first. Expect weak engagement signals, falling deliverability, and lifecycle journeys that feel like trying to read a menu in the dark. This issue digs into the hidden cost of being vague in CRM and email, and how clarity outperforms creativity every single time.
Here’s the idea: When Everything Is For Everyone, Nothing Converts
Vague messaging is expensive because it decays the two things your CRM relies on most. One is behavioural signals, and the other is identity clarity. If your ICP definition is fuzzy and your value proposition is no sharper than a toddler’s crayon, subscribers do not know how to self-identify. They cannot decide if they belong, which kills opens, depresses clicks, and trains inbox providers to assume your emails are of low value.
According to Litmus, subscriber engagement is still the top factor in deliverability decisions. That means every fuzzy sentence you send has a downstream cost. Vague inputs produce weak signals, which produce expensive outcomes.
This is like buying a gym membership for your emails and then never letting them touch a treadmill.
Teardown
What Works:
Companies with crisp ICPs and explicit messaging tend to have clear segmentation, stronger pre-click behaviour, and cleaner CRM data. Klaviyo’s 2024 benchmarking shows that segmented, targeted emails generate significantly higher revenue per recipient. Clarity guides action. Action reinforces your sending reputation.
What Fails:
Brands that position themselves as “for everyone” usually rely on generic messaging that produces low engagement. That shows up as high delete without read, low time in inbox, and volatile spam signals. Gmail’s 2024 spam update highlighted engagement quality as a core filter input. Vague emails struggle here.
Why:
Vagueness forces subscribers to interpret your message rather than absorb it. Cognitive load increases. Friction increases. People opt out mentally long before they unsubscribe physically. When your CRM cannot rely on clean behavioural signals, every downstream workflow becomes harder to optimize.
Framework
Things to Consider:
Does this message create instant self-identification for the reader?
Can your CRM infer intent from the behaviour this email is likely to trigger?
Would a new subscriber understand the offer without context?
Decision Path:
If the offer is broad, segment by problem state. If the segments overlap, tighten your ICP before you tighten your copy. If your ICP is solid but engagement is weak, audit message clarity before subject line creativity.
Trade-Offs:
Clarity narrows your pool but increases signal quality. Broad messaging fills your list but lowers deliverability. Crisp ICPs make measurement easier but force you to prioritize value over volume.
Outcome Focus
Human: Reduce cognitive load and give people a fast way to recognize themselves in your message. That builds trust and reduces friction.
Business: Clear messaging raises engagement, which improves deliverability. It also lowers acquisition and retention costs on the entire CRM engine.
Measurement Prompts
Are people clicking on the first three links or scanning because the call to action is unclear?
Do subscribers with clear ICP alignment outperform your general list in actions per open?
Does clarity correlate with lower spam complaints for your highest volume of sends?
Metrics:
Click to open rate by segment clarity
Time to action (how fast after open do people click)
Ratio of positive to negative signals per email (clicks, replies, saves vs deletes, spam reports)
Ethics Check
Clarifying your ICP should never mean excluding people unfairly, stereotyping, or personalizing beyond consent. Ethical CRM respects boundaries. You want clarity, not creepiness.
Reflect and Apply
Which email in your lifecycle is the vaguest and why?
What single message could you rewrite to reduce interpretation?
Which segments in your CRM rely on assumptions instead of explicit signals?
Introducing the first AI-native CRM
Connect your email, and you’ll instantly get a CRM with enriched customer insights and a platform that grows with your business.
With AI at the core, Attio lets you:
Prospect and route leads with research agents
Get real-time insights during customer calls
Build powerful automations for your complex workflows
Join industry leaders like Granola, Taskrabbit, Flatfile and more.
Tip of the Week
If you cannot summarize an email’s value in one sentence that a reader could repeat to a friend, you are not ready to send it.
Practical Focus
Vagueness Kills Your CRM Results
Vague messaging is one of the most expensive silent failures in CRM because it erodes your sender reputation before you even notice. Behavioural data gets muddy, segmentation gets sloppy, and lifecycle automation turns into a series of polite nudges instead of revenue drivers. ActiveCampaign’s recent release notes emphasize predictive actions that rely on clean inputs. That means your clarity problem does not remain in your copy. It becomes a machine learning problem in your CRM, which means the cost compounds.
It is like telling your GPS ‘take me somewhere nice’ and acting surprised when you end up in a parking lot.
Additional Resources for Your Email Strategy to Avoid Vagueness
🤖 Meta is testing AI-generated ad audiences, which should make every CRM marketer sweat a bit since poorly defined ICPs will get even blurrier
🛒 Shopify released new customer segment analytics that help clarify purchase intent. A gift for anyone tired of guessing.
📉 Klaviyo added improvements to predictive churn modelling. Great if your messaging is clear and terrible if it is vague.
✉️ Gmail is tightening spam complaint thresholds again: Vague messages will not survive this winter.
🔒 Apple Mail privacy reports show rising pre-fetch behaviour, meaning you need stronger post-click clarity.
✍️ TikTok is rolling out interest level scoring for ads. If your ICP is fuzzy, good luck mapping this to CRM cohorts.
🧑🤝🧑 Microsoft Ads launched new audience insights. Email teams should care because cross-channel clarity boosts CRM data reliability.
📧 HubSpot published new benchmarks showing significant gaps between segmented and general emails. Spoiler: specific emails win.
📊 Reddit announced new ad metrics tied to community intent. CRM teams, borrow that idea immediately.
📈 LinkedIn’s revamped ad relevance model rewards clarity. A theme, you might notice.
A Final Note
Don’t Play Safe
Vague messages feel safe because they do not exclude anyone, but exclusion is exactly what makes your email valuable. Clarity is not risky. It is revenue.
Core focus: Vague messaging is the silent assassin of your CRM. Tighten your ICP before your inbox provider tightens it for you. And remember, if your email is so vague that even your cat cannot tell who it is for, it is time to rewrite.
Until next Tuesday,
Practical marketing psychology for email and lifecycle.
Ships every Tuesday.